A Guide for Worker Classification

By John Pontius, Tax Section Co-Chair

Employers are required to withhold and pay Social Security and Medicare (“FICA”), as well as federal unemployment (“FUTA”) taxes (collectively “Payroll Taxes”) with respect to workers that are classified as “employees” under applicable Internal Revenue Service guidance. However, employers who hire independent contractors avoid these taxes. As a result, many employers are tempted to classify workers, often incorrectly, as independent contractors to reduce their taxes. As set forth below, misclassification of workers can result in significant exposure in the form of back taxes and penalties. This article does not address the state tax issues related to worker classification.

The IRS last estimated the tax gap between taxes owed and taxes collected for worker misclassification in 1984. The IRS estimated this tax gap to be $1.6 billion per year based upon a finding that 15% of employers misclassified 3.4 million workers as independent contractors.

A 2012 Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (“TIGTA”) report found that misclassifying a worker with yearly earnings of $43,007 could save the employer $3,710 per year. Over the last three years, IRS audited over 6,000 employers and collected over $10 million in taxes. These audits tend to focus on small businesses in the trucking, home health care, and construction industries.

As the IRS auditors continue to target worker misclassification it is important for employers to properly classify workers from the date of hire. For employers who have misclassified workers, they can seek relief from employment tax liability through Section 3509, Section 530 or through the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program. Starting in 2015, the Affordable Care Act will penalize employers with more than 50 employees if they fail to offer affordable health coverage to full time employees and their dependents. Accordingly, now is a good time for employers to review if they have properly classified their workers.

Worker Classification

While the IRS has defined certain workers as statutory employees and statutory non-employees, most workers are classified under the common law. In 1987, the IRS provided 20 common law factors for determining whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor. The primary factor is the amount of control the employer has over the worker. When the employer controls the daily work, the worker is more likely an employee. In 1996, the IRS streamlined the worker classification criteria to three factors; behavioral control, financial control and relationship of the parties. Behavioral control exists if the employer has the right to direct or control how the worker does the work. Financial control is present if the employer has the right to direct or control the business part (i.e. profit or loss) of the work. Relationship of the parties is based upon how the business and workers perceive the relationship.

Relief from Employment Tax Liability

If the IRS retroactively reclassifies independent contractors as employees, it is authorized to assess the employer with federal employment taxes, penalties and interest. Fortunately, the IRS provides several forms of relief for taxpayers with employer tax liability.

For employers with reasonable cause who filed Forms 1099 for erroneously classified independent contractors, Section 3509 of the Internal Revenue Code reduces the tax rate to 20% of the employee’s portion of the FICA taxes. If the employer did not have reasonable cause, the rate increases to 40% of the employee’s portion of the FICA taxes. Section 3509 does not apply if the employer intentionally disregards the requirement to deduct and withhold employment taxes. Also Section 3509 does not provide relief for the employer’s portion of the FICA taxes or FUTA taxes. Going forward, the employer remains responsible for making Social Security, Medicare and federal unemployment tax payments for its employees.

Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 as amended prevents the IRS from retroactively reclassifying independent contractors as employees. It provides employers with a safe harbor from employment tax liability if the taxpayer (1) had reasonable basis for not treating the workers as employees, (2) was consistent in its treatment of the workers as contractors, and (3) consistently filed all information returns (i.e. Forms 1099s) with the IRS. If the employer qualifies for Section 530 relief, it will continue to classify its workers as independent contractors. The major benefit is that the employer continues to avoid making Social Security, Medicare and federal unemployment tax payments for these independent contractors.

For taxpayers that have misclassified their workers as independent contractors, the IRS provides amnesty through the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (“VCSP”). As a result, employers can resolve their past worker classification issues at a low cost by voluntarily reclassifying their workers or a class of workers. To be eligible for the VSCP, the employer must meet the following requirements: (1) consistently treated workers in the past as independent contractors, (2) filed all Forms 1099 for the workers for the previous three years, and (3) not currently under audit by the IRS, Department of Labor or a state agency concerning the classification of these workers. Note that if the IRS contacts an employer based upon a worker filing Form SS-8, Determination of Work Status, it is not an audit for VCSP purposes.

There are many benefits of the VCSP. The taxpayer pays only 10 percent of the employment tax liability that would have been due for the most recent year had the workers been properly classified as employees. Interest and penalties are waived. Additionally the employer will not be subject to an employment tax audit for worker classification for prior years. Going forward the employer would be responsible for making Social Security, Medicare and federal unemployment tax payments for its employees.

Now Is the Time To Review Worker Classification

As a result of the large tax gap in employment taxes based upon worker misclassification, the IRS will continue to make this issue a priority. The potential consequences of a misclassification are severe. It is important that employers review all worker classifications to reduce their potential audit exposure.

 

Originally published in the Newsletter of the Bar Association of Montgomery County, Maryland. 

Testimonials
Client Reviews
Posted on Google Google
Chris Stoll profile picture
Chris Stoll
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We contacted Pontius regarding a legal matter. The staff listened carefully to our questions and concerns, then followed up with a phone call to further discuss our situation. This discussion was very useful and helped give us direction to start resolving our issue and concerns. All the staff were very courteous and kind.
Posted on Google Google
Cris C profile picture
Cris C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very helpful and professional!
Posted on Google Google
Yuanting Luo profile picture
Yuanting Luo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
John is very knowledgable on the tax law. It's a great help after talking with John regarding my tax situation.
Posted on Google Google
Claire Sanderson profile picture
Claire Sanderson
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
John and his team were very professional and responded to my questions and provided guidance quickly.
Posted on Google Google
Prince Mampouya profile picture
Prince Mampouya
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had an exceptional experience working with John Pontius and his team. Within minutes of submitting a consultation request through their website, I received a feedback from Gigi (Executive Assistant) at his office for a seamless preliminary intake. The following day, I spoke directly with John, who was not only incredibly friendly but also remarkably knowledgeable. He broke down a complex situation into clear, actionable options and thoroughly answered every single question I had. If you need expert guidance and prompt, high-touch service, I highly recommend John Pontius.
Posted on Google Google
Alex Kaufman profile picture
Alex Kaufman
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Incredibly helpful and easy to get a free consult. Recommend
Posted on Google Google
South Carolina Ave profile picture
South Carolina Ave
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We had a very positive experience working with Pontius Tax Law. John and his team were very knowledgeable, responsive, courteous and professional. I would definitely recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
KER profile picture
KER
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I called John frantically after discovering an error on my taxes that spanned a few years. He called me back and was patient, kind, and exceptionally competent in helping me fix my situation, as was Dana on his team. I’m deeply grateful for their help and would not hesitate to recommend them for any sort of tax issue. Thank you again!
Posted on Google Google
walt winston profile picture
walt winston
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I would highly recommend Pontius Tax Law for anyone navigating complex tax issues. From the very first consultation, it was clear that I was in the hands of true professionals who actually care. In fact, they actually care—and that makes all the difference when you are dealing with the stress of tax law. I would especially like to thank Dana. She was absolutely instrumental in managing my case. Dana is incredibly diligent, responsive, and possesses a deep understanding of the internal workings of the IRS. She kept me informed and managed each step of the process with total professionalism. What I appreciated most was how she patiently awaited my responses and the various documents she required. Because of my disability, my responsiveness was sometimes delayed, but Dana remained patient and accommodating throughout. I want to thank both Dana and John tremendously. They are worth every penny, not only for the peace of mind they provide but for their actual accomplishments in what is a very high-stakes process. Sincerely, Walt Winston
Posted on Google Google
Mike M profile picture
Mike M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Called after hours and was meeting with John and his team the next morning! Very professional group who's value to me was evident right away!